Oliver Tarvet vs Paul Jubb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 11:04 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Tarvet vs P. Jubb

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Tarvet 1 - 0 Jubb
They have played 3 sets in total, with Oliver Tarvet winning 2 and Paul Jubb winning 1. The last match between Oliver Tarvet and Paul Jubb was at the M25 Roehampton, 10-08-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Oliver Tarvet getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tarvet | 1 |
Jubb | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(F) M25 Roehampton(08-10-25)
O. Tarvet vs P. Jubb H2H Profile
O. Tarvet vs P. Jubb Match Preview
- Tarvet's second serve points win rate stands at 40.64%, while Jubb outperforms with 46.2% over the past six months. Could this stat suggest a competitive edge for Jubb? Yes, especially considering the correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- When it comes to opponent second serve returns, Jubb again edges out Tarvet, winning 44.95% of points compared to Tarvet's 41.41%. How crucial is this difference? It's significant, as first serve returns also show Jubb with a slight advantage.
- Under pressure, Jubb has a higher breakpoint save rate of 56.29%, while Tarvet has 43.07%. Does this suggest Jubb is more resilient during critical points? Yes.
- In overall match performance over the last year, Tarvet has been more successful, winning 85.71% of their matches, compared to Jubb's 54%. Could this indicate superior consistency? Potentially, but context matters.
- Analyzing best surfaces, Tarvet excels on Hard courts with an 82% win rate, while Jubb's strength lies on Clay with a 72% win rate. Which player benefits more on the current surface? That depends on the match location.
- Comparing tournament levels, Tarvet has mainly competed in Futures/Satellites with high success (87.5%), whereas Jubb has faced tougher competition in Challengers, winning 34.48% of matches. Who has faced tougher opponents? Jubb, based on tournament characteristics.
- With respect to opponent quality, Tarvet has played higher ranked players on average, suggesting tougher match challenges. How does this impact his performance? It potentially sharpens Tarvet's skills against stronger opponents.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Jubb has a stronger record, having won 64% of decisive sets, whereas Tarvet has won 50%. Does this hint at Jubb's resilience in tight scenarios? Yes.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Jubb again leads, converting 32.09% of opportunities compared to Tarvet's 27.5%. Will this acute ability to capitalize on chances influence the outcome? Likely, as it indicates readiness in key moments.
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head statistics reveal distinct areas where both players excel. Jubb shows stronger performance in second serve and return games, breakpoint saving, as well as conversion rates, highlighting his ability to handle pressure and seize opportunities effectively.
Tarvet, on the other hand, has demonstrated consistent overall match performance over the last year and has experience against slightly higher-ranked opponents, suggesting a well-rounded skill set and high match readiness.
Considering Jubb's strength in deciding sets and his proficiency in converting breakpoints, he appears slightly more equipped to exploit critical moments in the upcoming match. Therefore, Jubb is likely the favorite to win this match.
Oliver Tarvet vs Paul Jubb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Tarvet vs P. Jubb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 12 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:58:21 | Avg. Match Time | 2:58:21 |
61% (53/87) | 1st Serve % | 70% (66/94) |
64% (34/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (36/66) |
56% (19/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
48% (45/94) | Return Pts Won % | 39% (34/87) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Tarvet Recent Matches Played
P. Jubb Recent Matches Played

O. Tarvet vs P. Jubb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
79.73% (59/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.49% (245/118) |
74.39% (122/42) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.18% (543/303) |
60.53% (894/583) | Games Win/Loss | 55.06% (4453/3634) |
81.67% (49/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 71.20% (136/55) |
0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.15% (57/22) |
66.67% (4/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.69% (30/22) |
75.00% (6/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.66% (22/19) |
0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
232 | Aces Total | 1145 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
131 | Total Double Faults | 1084 |
1:42:7 | Average Match Time | 1:37:6 |
379.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.96 |
58% (2316/3989) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14816/23782) |
72% (1659/2316) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10311/14816) |
55% (916/1673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4700/8966) |
51% (243/475) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1091/2626) |
44% (1853/4187) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10204/24714) |
80.00% (4/1) | Slam W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 52.80% (66/59) |
80.60% (54/13) | Futures W/L | 78.85% (164/44) |
82% (55/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (242/354) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
73% (11/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (72/119) |
75% (12/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (66/117) |
94% (54/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (238/214) |
4% (54/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (238/23) |
40% (20/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (125/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
